We verify what suppliers report, for the people who have to rely on it.
Spatial Sustainability Hub is a verification practice. We test whether the activities and results reported by suppliers and implementation partners are supported by evidence — commissioned and paid by the party carrying the risk. Our registered purpose has not changed: digital services with a focus on data credibility and compliance. What changed is which end of it we lead with. Credible data is the charter; verification engagements are how we sell it first; software is how we scale it later.
To provide accurate, transparent, and actionable data solutions for organizations engaged in sustainable development, agroforestry, carbon-project evidence, and social impact projects.
Principles, not a manifesto.
These are the ideas we keep coming back to in product decisions. We put them here so you can decide quickly whether we're the right team to work with.
Provenance beats aggregation.
A number you can trace to its source is worth ten averaged numbers. We design every product around keeping that trace intact — even when it makes the UI less tidy.
Field reality, not glossy dashboards.
Sustainability work happens on farms, in cooperatives, at port. The software has to survive that environment — patchy internet, shared devices, real fatigue.
Compliance is a workflow, not a report.
EUDR Due Diligence Statements and data-protection scorecards fail when treated as a once-a-year output. We build for the daily workflow that produces them.
Honest about tradeoffs.
Every product has a defined scope. Verdex focuses on pre-screening; Commodity is focused on cocoa. We name what each tool does — and does not — so you know what you are getting.
Privacy at the data layer.
MyDataCompliance collects only your company name and email and auto-deletes after 90 days. We can't build privacy tools while hoarding personal data.
Small team, long horizon.
We are deliberately small. Less venture-scale storytelling, more time fixing the actual problem the user just emailed about.
Independent by construction.
We contract with, and are paid by, the buyer commissioning the review — never the supplier under review. We never price by findings volume, and verification stays contractually separate from any remediation work.
Three verdicts, never collapsed.
Supported, insufficient evidence, contradicted. "Insufficient evidence" is not an allegation, and a clean result is a valuable result — a firm whose fee depends on finding problems will find them.
Our advantage is geography, and it is hard to copy.
The party carrying the legal and commercial risk sits in Europe. The evidence sits on farms in Africa. A buyer cannot verify a planting claim or a training register from a desk abroad, and cannot reasonably accept the supplier's own word for it. We are here — with the satellite baselines, the analytical tooling, and the ability to walk onto the farm.
Claim types are identical everywhere.
Training delivered, inputs distributed, farms mapped, beneficiaries counted, volumes attributed. The crop changes; the claim ladder and the tests do not. We are not a cocoa firm.
Proximity, speed and cost — never brand.
Global inspection firms already sell this. We compete on being where the evidence is, and on a method you can inspect line by line.
A verdict with the records behind it.
Not a chart. Supported, insufficient evidence, or contradicted — each traceable to a source row, a rule, and a date.